Black Slaves Had Not Been

Forget China and Russia, They Are Newcomers to Capitalism. Western Capitalism is the Prototypical Version and Has Been Racist From Day One (if We Agree That There Was a First Day): Always and Forever Racist. Does This Mean That Manchester in , Where, According to Friedrich Engels' Description, All Exploited Workers Were White, Was Not Capitalist? No, Because Those Workers Were Producing Fabrics From Cotton Grown and Harvested by Black Slaves in the Southern United States. That's True, but I'm Not Sure It's Enough for a Discussion.

About Necessity. Consider a Counterfactual Possibility: if Available, the Recruitment of Irish Workers Would Have Begun Much Earlier Than It Did. Capitalism Would Not Have Stopped Its Rise Even if the Slave Trade Had Not Taken Place. But the Example of Manchester and the Southern Plantations of the United States Suggests What We All Know Now: Capitalism is a UK Mobile Database Global Economic System and Depends on the Exploitation of People of Color Around the World. Here, However, It Seems Clear That the Key Issue is Exploitation, Not Racism. Given Global Demographics, the Majority of Workers in Any Global Economy Will Be People of Color. Even in a Democratically or Socio-democratically Regulated Global System, the Majority of Workers and.





Most Managers – the Lower Class and the Ruling Class – Will Not Be White. In Fact, What Would Rightly Be Considered Racist Would Be the Refusal of Any Transnational Company to Hire People of Color. (in the Pennsylvania Town Where I Grew Up, the Local Steel Company Did Not Hire, and Therefore Did Not Exploit, Either Jews or Black People. I Suppose This is Also an Example of Racial Capitalism.) All of This Suggests That Capitalism and Racism Must Be Analyzed Separately. Sometimes They Overlap, as They Do in the United States Today. But the Overlap is Circumstantial, Not Necessary. The Two Phenomena Are Different.